Independent business valuation services for transactions, fundraising, tax, IFRS and litigation. London-based, working across UK, GCC, India and Singapore.
We provide expert, tailored valuation advice to help businesses unlock value, seize opportunities, and make confident decisions. Whether selling, acquiring, or raising capital, our partner-led approach ensures solutions align with your strategic goals.
Our valuation advisory services support businesses at every stage of their journey. From preparing for a sale, exploring acquisitions, raising capital, or attracting investment, we provide hands-on, partner-led guidance tailored to your strategic objectives. By collaborating closely with directors, shareholders, and stakeholders, we uncover opportunities, optimise value, and deliver clarity in complex decisions. Through long-term relationships, we gain deep insight into your unique challenges and goals, ensuring our advice creates measurable impact and sustainable growth.
Delivered an independent, board-ready valuation of Orfium, applying established methodologies and relevant market benchmarks. Assessed the business model and growth drivers and provided a clear valuation range with key assumptions to inform fundraising and strategic decisions.

Delivered an independent, board-ready valuation of Orfium, applying established methodologies and relevant market benchmarks. Assessed the business model and growth drivers and provided a clear valuation range with key assumptions to inform fundraising and strategic decisions.
Delivered an independent, investor-ready valuation of Rihal, an Oman-based data and digital services platform. Delivered a clear valuation range with key assumptions and sensitivity cases—linking sales pipeline, KPIs to the growth plan and GCC expansion—to support investor discussions and term-sheet alignment.

Delivered an independent, investor-ready valuation of Rihal, an Oman-based data and digital services platform. Delivered a clear valuation range with key assumptions and sensitivity cases—linking sales pipeline, KPIs to the growth plan and GCC expansion—to support investor discussions and term-sheet alignment.
Delivered a Series A valuation for Safeheron, a digital-asset custody and security infrastructure platform by benchmarking against private-market comparables in digital-asset infrastructure/cybersecurity, calibrated to ARR growth, retention, unit economics, and regulatory profile, and produced negotiation-ready pre/post-money ranges with milestone-based step-ups.

Delivered a Series A valuation for Safeheron, a digital-asset custody and security infrastructure platform by benchmarking against private-market comparables in digital-asset infrastructure/cybersecurity, calibrated to ARR growth, retention, unit economics, and regulatory profile, and produced negotiation-ready pre/post-money ranges with milestone-based step-ups.
Built a defensible pricing framework for Super Click Trading LLC (Fonezone.ae) by benchmarking refurb grades and warranty terms against regional grey-market pricing and leading Indian/EU refurb players. Inputs included SKU-level comps, grade-wise yield/DOA assumptions, and channel fees, anchored to the company’s certified testing and 7-day return policy.

Built a defensible pricing framework for Super Click Trading LLC (Fonezone.ae) by benchmarking refurb grades and warranty terms against regional grey-market pricing and leading Indian/EU refurb players. Inputs included SKU-level comps, grade-wise yield/DOA assumptions, and channel fees, anchored to the company’s certified testing and 7-day return policy.
Prepared a comprehensive valuation of Mamun’s platform using DCF and comparable fintech multiples, capturing its scaling potential in Oman and the GCC. Built an investor-ready data room with audited statements, user acquisition metrics, regulatory approvals, and pipeline opportunities, enabling Mamun to clearly communicate its growth story and attract institutional and strategic capital

Prepared a comprehensive valuation of Mamun’s platform using DCF and comparable fintech multiples, capturing its scaling potential in Oman and the GCC. Built an investor-ready data room with audited statements, user acquisition metrics, regulatory approvals, and pipeline opportunities, enabling Mamun to clearly communicate its growth story and attract institutional and strategic capital
Built a defensible valuation using DCF, trading comps, and sensitivity cases tailored to NTG’s project mix (public sector platforms and enterprise DX). Assembled an investor-ready data room—audited financials, contracts/pipeline evidence, delivery KPIs, partner credentials, and case studies—so NTG can present a clear scale thesis and capital needs to strategic and institutional investors.

Built a defensible valuation using DCF, trading comps, and sensitivity cases tailored to NTG’s project mix (public sector platforms and enterprise DX). Assembled an investor-ready data room—audited financials, contracts/pipeline evidence, delivery KPIs, partner credentials, and case studies—so NTG can present a clear scale thesis and capital needs to strategic and institutional investors.
Delivered a venture-style valuation for RYFFC using private-market comparables (Seed–Series A) and growth-adjusted revenue multiples anchored in MRR/ARR, NRR/churn. Blended stage-appropriate methods—private round comps, milestone-adjusted cases, and scenario-based pre/post-money ranges to set realistic pricing and dilution guardrails. The output is a crisp investor pack that ties valuation step-ups to product, traction, and pipeline milestones.

Delivered a venture-style valuation for RYFFC using private-market comparables (Seed–Series A) and growth-adjusted revenue multiples anchored in MRR/ARR, NRR/churn. Blended stage-appropriate methods—private round comps, milestone-adjusted cases, and scenario-based pre/post-money ranges to set realistic pricing and dilution guardrails. The output is a crisp investor pack that ties valuation step-ups to product, traction, and pipeline milestones.
Built an evidence-based price view for Zazuu, a two-sided remittance marketplace focused on lowering costs into Sub-Saharan Africa. Using recent private rounds in FX/remittance and money-movement (Seed–A) alongside operating metrics—GMV, take rate, corridor mix, repeat/retention, licensing status, partner coverage—we framed valuation bands that reflect marketplace traction and corridor economics. We mapped step changes (new corridors live, provider integrations, compliance milestones) to price impact and translated this into clear cap-table outcomes for different cheque sizes and option-pool scenarios.

Built an evidence-based price view for Zazuu, a two-sided remittance marketplace focused on lowering costs into Sub-Saharan Africa. Using recent private rounds in FX/remittance and money-movement (Seed–A) alongside operating metrics—GMV, take rate, corridor mix, repeat/retention, licensing status, partner coverage—we framed valuation bands that reflect marketplace traction and corridor economics. We mapped step changes (new corridors live, provider integrations, compliance milestones) to price impact and translated this into clear cap-table outcomes for different cheque sizes and option-pool scenarios.
Undertook a comprehensive valuation exercise for Coordinate Sport, a UK-based SaaS platform serving the sports sector. The work combined detailed financial analysis with market benchmarking to derive a robust view of enterprise value. We reviewed the company’s revenue model, growth trajectory, and customer metrics, and applied relevant trading and transaction multiples alongside forward-looking forecasts. The outcome provided management and shareholders with a defendable valuation framework to support capital raising, investor dialogue, and strategic decision-making.

Undertook a comprehensive valuation exercise for Coordinate Sport, a UK-based SaaS platform serving the sports sector. The work combined detailed financial analysis with market benchmarking to derive a robust view of enterprise value. We reviewed the company’s revenue model, growth trajectory, and customer metrics, and applied relevant trading and transaction multiples alongside forward-looking forecasts. The outcome provided management and shareholders with a defendable valuation framework to support capital raising, investor dialogue, and strategic decision-making.












Blash Advisory is a London-headquartered corporate finance and advisory firm specialising in independent business valuation, serving founders, private companies, private equity investors, family offices and corporate boards across the UK, EMEA, the Far East and India.
Our methodEvery valuation follows the same framework, so the figure a board, buyer, seller or tax authority receives is built on a documented method and a stated basis of value rather than a single opinion.
We establish why the valuation is needed, whether for a transaction, a fundraising, a tax filing, financial reporting under IFRS or a dispute, and fix the appropriate basis of value, such as market value or fair value. Purpose drives method, so this step is settled before any modelling begins.
We review historical and forecast financials and normalise them, removing one-off items, adjusting owner remuneration to a market rate and stripping out non-recurring costs, to establish maintainable earnings and a credible forecast as the foundation for every method.
We apply the recognised approaches: the income approach through discounted cash flow, the market approach through comparable company and precedent transaction multiples, and the asset approach where net assets drive value. Each is weighted according to the business and the purpose of the valuation.
We triangulate the outputs across methods, benchmark them against observed market multiples and comparable transactions, and reconcile any differences, so the conclusion rests on more than one line of evidence.
We apply the relevant discounts and premia, such as a discount for lack of marketability or a minority discount, stress-test the key assumptions, and document the result as a valuation range in a board-ready or audit-ready report supported by clearly stated sensitivities.
Blash Advisory advises across a broad range of situations, including the following.
A private company is valued by combining several established methods and reconciling them into a defensible range. The income approach discounts forecast cash flows or maintainable earnings to present value. The market approach applies multiples from comparable quoted companies and precedent transactions. The asset approach values the underlying net assets, which suits property-rich or holding companies. We normalise the financials first, removing one-off items and adjusting owner remuneration to a market rate, then weight the methods according to the business and the purpose of the valuation. The output is a documented range with the key assumptions and sensitivities set out.
We use the three recognised approaches and select among them according to the business and the reason for the valuation. The income approach, usually a discounted cash flow, is central for companies with forecastable earnings. The market approach uses comparable company multiples and precedent transaction multiples to benchmark value against observed evidence. The asset-based approach values net assets and is appropriate for property, investment or holding companies. For early-stage companies we also apply methods suited to limited financial history. We cross-check the results across methods so the conclusion does not rest on a single technique.
Market value and fair value are distinct standards, and the correct one depends on why the valuation is needed. Market value is the price a willing buyer and willing seller would agree in an open market, and it underpins most transactions and tax valuations. Fair value is a defined measurement used in financial reporting under IFRS and in certain shareholder contexts, and it can exclude discounts that a market valuation would apply, for example a minority discount in some statutory situations. Defining the basis of value at the outset is essential, because the same business can carry a different figure under each standard.
Early-stage and pre-revenue companies cannot be valued on historical earnings, so the methods differ. We look at the size of the addressable market, the strength of the team, the technology and intellectual property, traction such as users or pipeline, and evidence from recent funding rounds and comparable early-stage transactions. Scenario-based discounted cash flow, the venture capital method and market benchmarking each contribute a perspective. The result is expressed as a range with clearly stated assumptions, because uncertainty is high at this stage. For companies raising under SEIS or EIS, the valuation also has to fit the share structure and scheme rules.
The discount rate reflects the risk of the cash flows being valued. For an established company we build it from the cost of equity and, where relevant, the weighted average cost of capital, taking account of the risk-free rate, an equity risk premium, and company-specific and country risk. Early-stage and higher-risk businesses justify a higher rate to reflect the greater chance that forecasts are not met. The rate is one of the most sensitive inputs in a valuation, so we stress-test it and show how the conclusion moves across a range rather than relying on a single point.
A discount for lack of marketability, often shortened to DLOM, reflects the fact that shares in a private company cannot be sold as readily as quoted shares. A buyer of an unquoted holding accepts reduced liquidity, so the value is adjusted downward to reflect that. The size of the discount depends on factors such as the prospect of a future sale or listing, dividend policy, and any restrictions in the shareholders' agreement. A related adjustment is the minority discount, applied where the holding does not carry control. We document the basis for any discount so the figure can withstand scrutiny in a transaction, a tax review or a dispute.
Yes. We prepare valuations for a range of UK tax purposes, including share valuations for HMRC, valuations for gift and inheritance planning, and valuations supporting corporate reorganisations. Tax valuations generally use the statutory market value standard and must be supported in a form that can be defended to HMRC if questioned. Employee share schemes are a common reason for a tax valuation, in particular agreeing the value of shares under an EMI option scheme. We set out the methodology and assumptions clearly so the valuation stands up to review by the relevant tax authority.
Yes. We provide valuations required under IFRS and other reporting frameworks, including purchase price allocation after an acquisition, impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets, and the valuation of share-based payments. Financial reporting valuations use the fair value standard defined in the accounting standards and are prepared to a level of documentation that supports the audit. We work alongside the company's finance team and auditors so the assumptions, methods and conclusions are consistent with the reporting requirements and can be reviewed without friction during the audit.
Yes. Companies granting options under the Enterprise Management Incentive scheme need a defensible valuation of their shares to set the exercise price and to agree the position with HMRC. The valuation must reflect the specific rights of the shares under option, including any minority position and marketability discount. We prepare the valuation and the supporting rationale so it can be submitted to HMRC for agreement before options are granted, giving the company and its employees certainty on the tax treatment. The same approach applies to other UK employee share schemes.
Valuations for disputes, including shareholder exits, unfair prejudice claims and matrimonial cases, require independence and a clear, reasoned methodology, because the figure may be tested by another expert or by a court. We establish the correct valuation date and basis of value, which in some statutory disputes excludes a minority discount, then apply the appropriate methods and document every assumption. The report is written to stand as expert evidence, setting out the reasoning transparently so it can withstand challenge. Independence is central: the conclusion follows the evidence rather than the interests of the instructing party.
Businesses are commonly valued as a multiple of earnings, usually EBITDA or, for smaller companies, adjusted profit, and the multiple reflects the quality and durability of those earnings. Sector, growth rate, recurring revenue, customer concentration, management depth and size all move the multiple, so two companies with similar profit can command very different figures. Observed multiples from comparable quoted companies and recent transactions provide the benchmark. A meaningful multiple only emerges once earnings have been normalised, which is why we establish maintainable earnings before applying any market evidence.
Timing depends on the size and complexity of the business and the purpose of the valuation. An indicative range can be prepared quickly once financial statements and forecasts are available, while a full report for a transaction, tax filing, financial reporting or a dispute takes longer because it requires deeper analysis and documentation. The core inputs are historical accounts, management accounts, forecasts, details of the share structure and any shareholders' agreement, and background on the business and its market. The more complete the information, the tighter the valuation range, because uncertainty falls as the evidence improves.
Reviewed 2026-07-05